febbraio 19, 2010

MK-ULTRA: The CIA’s Mind Control Program


by Stephen Lendman Feb. 16, 2010 – SteveLendmanBlog -

MK-ULTRA was the code name for a secret CIA mind control program, begun in 1953, under Director Allen Dulles. Its purpose was multifold, including to perfect a truth drug for interrogating suspected Soviet spies during the Cold War. It followed earlier WW II hypnosis, primitive drugs research, and the US Navy’s Project Chatter, explained by its Bureau of Medicine and Surgery in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request as follows:


It began “in the fall of 1947 focusing on the identification and testing of drugs (LSD and others) in interrogations and the recruitment of agents. The research included laboratory experiments on both animal and human subjects. The program ended shortly after the Korean War in 1953.”


It was run under the direction of Dr. Charles Savage of the Naval Medical Research Institute, Bethesda, MD from 1947-1953, after which CIA’s Office of Scientific Intelligence continued it under the name Project Bluebird, its first mind control program to:



  • earn how to condition subjects to withstand information from being extracted from them by known means;

  • develop interrogation methods to exert control;

  • develop memory enhancement techniques; and

  • establish ways to prevent hostile control of Agency personnel.


In 1951, it was renamed Project Artichoke, then MK-ULTRA under Deputy CIA Director Richard Helms in 1953. It aimed to control human behavior through psychedelic and hallucinogenic drugs, electroshock, radiation, graphology, paramilitary techniques, and psychological/sociological/anthropological methods, among others — a vast open-field of mind experimentation trying anything that might work, legal or otherwise on willing and unwitting subjects.



Ongoing at different times were 149 sub-projects in 80 US and Canadian universities, medical centers and three prisons, involving 185 researchers, 15 foundations and numerous drug companies. Everything was top secret, and most records later destroyed, yet FOIA suits salvaged thousands of pages with documented evidence of the horrific experiments and their effects on human subjects.


Most were unwitting guinea pigs, and those consenting were misinformed of the dangers. James Stanley was a career soldier when given LSD in 1958 along with 1,000 other military “volunteers.” They suffered hallucinations, memory loss, incoherence, and severe personality changes. Stanley exhibited uncontrollable violence. It destroyed his family, impeded his working ability, and he never knew why until the Army asked him to participate in a follow-up study.


He sued for damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), his case reaching the Supreme Court in United States v. Stanley. Argued and decided in 1987, the Court dismissed his claim (5-4), ruling his injuries occurred during military service. Justices Thurgood Marshall, William Brennan and Sandra Day O’Conner wrote dissenting opinions, saying the Nuremberg Code applies to soldiers as well as civilians. In 1996, Stanley got $400,000 in compensation, but no apology from the government.


Perhaps MK-ULTRA’s most publicized victim was Frank Olsen, a biochemist working for the Army Chemical Corps’ Special Operations Division at Ft. Detrick, MD. On November 18, 1953, he was administered LSD. Immediately, he became agitated and severely paranoid. Nine days later, he reportedly committed suicide by jumping 13 stories to his death through a New York hotel’s closed window. His family members didn’t know he was drugged until MK-ULTRA was exposed in 1975.


President Gerald Ford apologized, granted a $750,000 settlement, but Olson’s son discovered documents suggesting his father was killed. In 1994, he exhumed the body, had it forensically evaluated, and the conclusion was homicide based on a previously undetected skull fracture suggesting a blow on the head and other disturbing evidence.


Stanley Glickman was another MK-ULTRA tragedy, an unwitting victim of hallucinogenic drugs and electroshock treatment. He became traumatized, couldn’t work, barely ate, suffered a psychological breakdown and never fully recovered. After learning about the CIA’s LSD experiments, he sued in 1983. The trial was delayed 16 years, he died, but his sister Gloria Kronisch pursued the case.


MK-ULTRA chief Stanley Gottleib was at issue, hired to run its Technical Service Staff (TSS) to develop poisons to assassinate political opponents, truth serum drugs for interrogating spies, and mind control techniques to create robot assassins or unwitting double agents. He used Nazi scientists and their state of the art methods, perfected on concentration camp victims. Some were known as programmers, skilled professionals in the art of breaking down and controlling the human mind.


Joseph Mengele did similar work, experimenting extensively with children and adults using mescaline, electroshock therapy, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, torture, rape, starvation, and trauma bonding. He was so successful with the latter technique that survivors expressed strong affection for him.


The CIA and US military copied the Nazi methodology through numerous programs, including MK-ULTRA, MK being an abbreviation for words “mind control” in German. According to obtained documents, it works best when severe trauma (such as rape) occurs by age three, the result often causing the personality to split or dissociate (called dissociative identity disorder or DID) to repress painful memories.


Therapists can cause multiple personality disorder (MPD) by mind manipulation, but early in life trauma makes victims especially vulnerable. Gottlieb focused on LSD for mind control and exotic poisons and drugs for political assassinations.


Under Operation Paperclip, 9,000 Nazi scientists and technicians were recruited to help undermine the Soviet Union.


In 1952, Gottlieb met Glickman in a Paris cafe, bought him a drink and laced it with LSD. After finally being held to account, he became ill. The trial was postponed, and on the eve of its resumption he died unexpectedly. At the time, New York Times and Los Angeles Times obituaries reported that his family refused to disclose the cause. The online WorldNet Daily explained it was after a “month-long bout with pneumonia,” saying that after being admitted to the University of Virginia Medical Center, he lapsed into a coma, never recovered, but foul play couldn’t be determined.


At trial against his estate, the judge died of a heart attack while exercising. The question again arose. Was it natural or was he killed, especially since his replacement was prejudicial to the plaintiff having thrown out his case two years earlier. Perhaps so after the jury ruled against Glickman’s family, denying them justice.


On December 22, 1974, Seymour Hersh exposed MK-ULTRA in a New York Times article. Headlined, “Huge CIA Operation Reported in US Against Antiwar Forces, Other Dissidents in Nixon Years,” it documented illegal activities, including secret experiments on US citizens during the 1960s and earlier. Church Committee Congressional investigations followed, headed by Senator Frank Church, on abusive intelligence practices, replaced by the Pike Committee five months later. The Rockefeller Commission, under vice president Nelson Rockefeller, also examined the domestic activities of the CIA, FBI, and military intelligence agencies.


By summer 1975, it was learned that CIA and Department of Defense had conducted illegal experiments on willing and unwitting subjects as part of an exhaustive program to influence human behavior through psychoactive drugs (including LSD and mescaline) and other chemical, biological, psychological, and other methods.


Origins of CIA Mind Manipulation Practices


CIA became interested in Montreal Dr. Ewen Cameron’s work at McGill University’s Allan Memorial Institute. With full knowledge of the Canadian government, he was funded to perform bizarre experiments on his psychiatric patients, including keeping them asleep and isolated for weeks, then administering large doses of electroshock and experimental drug cocktails, LSD and PCP angel dust among them.


Though clearly unethical, Cameron believed by blasting the human brain with an array of shocks, he could unmake impaired minds, rebuilding them with new personalities cleansed of their previous state. It was voodoo science and failed, but CIA gained a wealth of knowledge it’s used to this day.


In 1951, the Agency engaged McGill’s director of psychology, Dr. Donald Hebb, and others to conduct sensory-deprivation experiments on volunteer students. They showed intense isolation disrupts clear thinking enough to make subjects receptive to suggestion. They were also formidable interrogation techniques amounting to torture when forcibly administered.


These early experiments laid the foundation for CIA’s two-stage torture process: sensory deprivation followed by overload. University of Wisconsin historian Alfred McCoy documented them in his book, A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror, calling them “the first real revolution in the cruel science of pain in more than three centuries.”


CIA developed and codified them in manuals, used extensively in Southeast Asia, Central America, Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantanamo, and at secret black sites globally. McCoy referred to an offshore information extraction mini-gulag during the Cold War and War on Terror. Out of sight, nothing is banned, including physical harshness and psychologically crippling mind control methods that turn human beings into mush.


MK-ULTRA was one of them, even though Gerald Ford’s 1976 Executive Order (EO 11905) “establish(ed) policies to improve the quality of intelligence needed for national security (and) establish(ed) effective oversight to assure compliance with law in the management and direction of intelligence agencies and departments of the national government.”


The EO prohibited “experimentation with drugs on human subjects, except with their informed consent, in writing and witnessed by a disinterested party, of each such human subject,” according to guidelines issued by the National Commission. Subsequent Carter and Reagan directives banned all human experimentation. Nonetheless, they continue, in violation of the Nuremberg Code that prohibits:



  • medical experiments without the voluntary consent of human subjects — “without coercion, fraud, deceit, and the full disclosure of known risks;”

  • those “where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur;” and

  • only ones expected “to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study….”


Conducting human mind control experiments are clearly illegal and unethical. They’re more sophisticated than ever today, and claims that MK-ULTRA experiments were halted in the 1970s were false. Renamed they continue and much more.


America’s Long History of Human Experimentation


Prior examples include:


– In 1931, Dr. Cornelius Rhoads infected human subjects with cancer cells under the auspices of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Investigations; Rhoads later conducted radiation exposure experiments on American soldiers and civilian hospital patients;


– In 1932, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study began on 200 black men; they’re weren’t told of their illness, were denied treatment, and were used as human guinea pigs to follow their disease symptoms and progression; they all subsequently died;


– in 1940, 400 Chicago prisoners were infected with malaria to study the effects of new and experimental drugs;


– from 1942-1945, the US Navy used human subjects (locked in chambers) to test gas masks and clothing;


– since the 1940s, human radiation experiments were conducted to test its effects and determine how much can kill; unwitting subjects were used in prisons, hospitals, orphanages, and mental institutions, including men, women, children, and the unborn of all races, mostly people from lower socio-economic brackets; in addition, more than 200,000 US soldiers were exposed to above ground nuclear tests; many later became ill and died;


– in 1945, the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) implemented “Program F,” the most exhaustive American study of fluoride’s health effects — a key component in atomic bomb production and one of the most toxic chemicals known; it causes marked adverse central nervous system effects; in the interest of national security, the information was suppressed;


– in 1945, VA hospital patients became guinea pigs for medical experiments;


– in 1947, the AEC’s Colonel EE Kirkpatrich issued secret document #07075001, stating that the agency will begin administering intravenous doses of radioactive substances to human subjects;


– in 1949, the US Army released biological agents in US cities to study the effects of a real germ warfare attack; tests continued secretly through at least the 1960s in San Francisco, New York, Washington, DC, Panama City and Key West, FL, Minnesota, other midwest locations, along the Pennsylvania turnpike and elsewhere;


– in 1950, the Defense Department (DOD) began open-air testing of nuclear weapons in desert areas, then monitored downwind residents for medical problems and mortality rates;


– in 1951, African-Americans were exposed to potentially fatal stimulants as part of a race-specific fungal weapons test in Virginia;


– in 1953, DOD released zinc cadmium sulfide gas over Winnipeg, Canada, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Fort Wayne, the Monocacy River Valley, MD, and Leesburg, VA — to determine how efficiently chemical agents can be dispersed;


– in 1953, joint Army-Navy-CIA experiments were conducted in New York and San Francisco, exposing tens of thousands of people to the airborne agents Serratia marcescens and Bacillus glogigii;


– in 1955, the CIA released bacteria from the Army’s Tampa, FL biological warfare arsenal to test its ability to infect human populations;


– in 1956, the US military released mosquitoes infected with Yellow Fever over Savannah, GA and Avon Park, FL to test the health effects on humans;


– in 1965, Homesburg State Prison, Philadelphia prisoners were subjected to dioxin, the highly toxic Agent Orange agent, to study their carcinogenic effects;


– in 1966, the New York subway system was used for a germ warfare experiment;


– in 1969, an apparent nerve agent killed thousands of sheep in Utah;


– in 1970, the Military Review reported that “ethnic weapons” development was intensified to be able to target specific ethnic groups thought susceptible to genetic differences and DNA variations;


– in 1976, Americans were warned about an earlier Swine Flu scare, urging everyone to be vaccinated; millions complied, many of whom were harmed; 500 Guillan-Barre Syndrome (GBS — the deadly nerve disorder) resulted; people died from respiratory failure after severe paralysis, and experts said the vaccine increased the GBS risk level eight-fold;


– in 1985 and 1986, open-air biological agents testing was done in populated areas;


– in 1990, over 1,500 six-month old Los Angeles black and hispanic babies were given an experimental measles vaccine, never informing parents of the potential harm


– in 1990 and 1991 before deploying to the Persian Gulf, all US troops were inoculated with experimental anthrax and botulinum toxoid vaccines, even though concerns were raised about their adverse long-term effects; over 12,000 died and over 30% became ill from non-combat-related factors in what subsequently was called Gulf War Syndrome, the result of exposure to a variety of toxins;


– in 1994, Senator Jay Rockefeller issued a report revealing that for the past 50 or more years, DOD used hundreds of thousands of US military personnel, exposing them to dangerous substances experimentally; materials included mustard and nerve gas, ionizing radiation, psychochemicals, hallucinogens, and other drugs;


– in 1995, Dr. Garth Nicolson discovered that toxic agents used during the Gulf War were pre-tested on Texas Department of Corrections prisoners;


– in 1996, DOD admitted that Gulf War troops were exposed to chemical agents; and


– in 2009, experimental vaccines were again used to inoculate people globally in response to another hyped Swine Flu scare; scattered reports of illnesses and deaths followed.


MK-ULTRA Victim Maryam Ruhullah


This writer will interview Ruhullah and Dr. James Randall Noblitt, a licensed psychologist, on The Progressive Radio News Hour (on The Progressive Radio Network), February 18 at 10AM US Central time to discuss MK-ULTRA, Ruhullah’s experience and Noblitt’s work with survivors of extreme abuse and individuals afflicted with identity dissociation. Noblitt is a Professor at the California School of Professional Psychology and Chair of the International Society of Trauma and Dissociation Ritual Abuse/Mind Control Interest Group.


The program will be archived for later listening.


As an MK-ULTRA victim, Ruhullah’s memory was impaired and somewhat still is because of what she experienced. She explained it as follows.


In the early 1970s, she lived in Boston, MA, was married with a six-year old son, and as a lawyer worked for a prestigious firm, its name she can’t remember. “One day, two federal agents came to (her) home unannounced,” asking her to be a federal witness against an alleged organized crime figure. For her safety, they explained, she’d be placed in protective custody for a period not exceeding six months. She was asked to leave her family and job immediately, and say nothing to her husband and employer.


She “was forced to leave (her) home with the agents that day.” She got no choice, and “was treated more like a prisoner than a witness.” She couldn’t use the phone or communicate with anyone, was transferred frequently, and held in “very low budget places,” during which time her life “became a succession of abuses and exploitations.”


“To this day,” she says, she doesn’t know precisely “when or why the government decided to use” her for MK-ULTRA experimentation, “but one day (she) was a mother, wife, and attorney, then, (later) had no memory of (her) past.”


Having partly recovered it, she recalls “being given non-medically necessary electro-shock treatments. This was done to create amnesia (to block her) core personality and replac(e) it with” only need-to-know information.


She remembers “that the shock treatment given (her) was so severe and often that one day something happened and” she wasn’t returned to her room. She now speaks of “an unbelievable long list of horrid exploitations and inhumane abuses” done to her.


In the late 1980s, fragments of her memory returned. She sought information on her case through an FOIA request, but was told no records were found. From 1992-1996, no one helped her until a member of B’nai Brith, Stephanie Suleiman, offered to do so but needed a few weeks to complete other work.


When Ruhullah recontacted her, she learned that “this thirty-two year old mother of two died of a heart attack,” very suspicious given her age.


Ruhullah also explains that federal agents stopped communicating with her. Her experiences were “totally removed from the public record,” and she went from “being a missing person to becoming a person erased.” She’s now divorced and unable to contact her children and former friends. “The US government does not want (her) story told.”


She adds that the “only way (she) can measure (her) length of time held (is) by her son’s age. (He) was six when (agents) entered (her) home, and he is (now) in his late thirties.” She considers herself to have been continuously separated from her children, grandchildren, family, friends, assets, memories, and educated skills.


She calls each day “an experience of being held against (her) will while living in a vat of bureaucratic arrogance which refuses to acknowledge what was done (made worse by stopping (her) from getting (her) life back.” Each day she’s “being more injured and having more of (her) life robbed from” her.


She says she “was not released from custody.” After being used for medical experiments, she was “given an implanted false identity, then left penniless and without proof of (her) true identity or lineage.” She still considers herself a prisoner, a body with no persona, with little knowledge of her former self, stripped of everything important in her life.


MK-ULTRA and Ruhullah’s story will be featured on the Progressive Radio News Hour on February 18 at 10AM US Central time on The Progressive Radio Network. Listen live or later through archives.


Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. Contact him at: lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site and listen to The Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org Mondays from 11AM-1PM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests. All programs are archived for easy listening. Read other articles by Stephen, or visit Stephen’s website.


Source: http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/02/mk-ultra-cias-mind-control-program.html

febbraio 17, 2010

Lunargate! Alex Burns Examines the Weird World of Moon Landing Conspiracies

250px-Apollo_11_Crew_During_Training_Exercise_-_GPN-2002-000032-228x300
The recent cuts to NASA’s budget, including the axing of the upcoming lunar missions, the Ares Rocket System, and the Orion Spacecraft, have left many of us quite scared for the future of the U.S. space program. This classic article from Alex Burns examines those that question whether or not NASA even got to the moon in the first place. Are we afraid to go back, or to go there at all?

Lunargate by Alex Burns


In a now infamous 1961 speech, US President John F. Kennedy pledged that America’s space program would “place a man on the moon before the decade’s close.” At the heart of cold war battles for geopolitical supremacy, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Mercury, Gemini and Apollo programs also became the vehicle for inculcating domestic populations with American values and belief systems.


NASA’s growing power, its protection by the Kennedy administration, and the rise of the Right Stuff astronaut as celebrity hid the steady growth of the Military-Industrial Complex that Eisenhower had warned about.


These anxieties — of monolithic social institutions controlling information, and the decline of US global empires — are the core of conspiracy theories claiming the historic Apollo moon landings were elaborately faked. The world was hoaxed.


Anatomy of a Faked Hoax?


Conspiracy theorists like Bill Kaysing and Ralph Rene claim that:


— The Nazis built a small moon base.


— Strange geological structures are evidence of alien life.


— NASA photos were ‘doctored’ and transmissions were censored.


— NASA “stage managed” astronaut interviews and press conferences.


— NASA “conditioned” astronauts by Nazi-derived mind control techniques.


— The Van Allen Belt’s high radiation levels prevented the astronauts from leaving Earth.


— Apollo 1 astronauts Grissom, Chaffee and White were going to reveal NASA’s conspiracy to the world, so they were murdered in a 1967 launchpad fire.


Perhaps the most believable part of Kaysing and Rene’s scenario is their analysis of the space industry as a political economy. The authors contend that, in a climate of lucrative multimillion dollar industrial contracts and public euphoria, the Military-Industrial Complex fueled the conspiratorial imperative for creating Lunargate.


The Medium is the Space Age


These hoax theories can teach us much about the Paranoid Style (Richard Hofstadter) of post-Watergate American politics. The fascination with decoding NASA photographs for clues and analysing suggestive scenes in films like Diamonds Are Forever (1971) and Capricorn One (1978) echo Marshall McLuhan’s media models and postmodern theorists’ fascination with ambiguous texts and the limits of knowledge.


When Bill Kaysing claims that the Apollo 13 debacle was a “simulation within a simulation,” or anonymous theorists suggest that director Stanley Kubrick filmed the historic Apollo 11 moon landing (July 20, 1969) on a Nevada soundstage, they offer scenarios that closely resemble postmodernist Jean Baudrillard’s concept of American culture as hyperreal:



People’s imagination demands the real thing, but in order to get it, they have to create fakes.





A Dark History, Indeed


NASA’s verifiable history has had some questionable aspects:


— The use of Nazi V2 rocket scientists saved by Operation Paperclip.


— Several key Apollo astronauts were 33-Masons.


— The questionable management decisions by Morton Thiokol Inc that indirectly caused the Challenger space shuttle disaster.


The real concern of these conspiracy theorists, maybe, is the longterm fate of NASA’s space program. Resource allocation pressures have made it difficult over the past thirty years for a largescale population the Overview Effect (comprehending Earth as a single integrated system that is post nation-state/tribal band) consciousness change that astronauts experienced.


US Congress passed a bill in 1999, celebrating the 30th anniversary of the Apollo moon landing . . . and then cut NASA’s annual budget by over $1 billion.


Maybe the real conspiracy is one of institutional infighting and bureaucratic stupidity. We have faith in fakes after all.


Further Reading:


The Wrong Stuff

Very indepth article by Wired writer Rogier van Bakel surveying the ‘moon hoax’ theories prevalent on the Internet and as American folklore: Alternative 3, Bill Kaysing, Ralph Rene, movie portrayals of moon hoaxes and a reply from NASA officials.


NASA

Search the NASA network for the latest space news, scientific research, photos, archives . . . and maybe the truth about the Apollo program?


The Moonlanding A Hoax?

Danny van Senten has compiled a definitive collection of NASA hoaxed moon landing resources, including essays, photos, links and more. Highly recommended!


The Lunar Anomalies Homepage

Mike Bara has assembled an incredible resource on moon anomalies with great navigation. Topics include: the 12th Planet search, unusual lunar structures, psychological effects of lunar eclipses and more. A must view!


The Enterprise Mission

Richard Hoagland’s controversial but detailed site is more well known for the Martian Case for the Face, but he has assembled an enviable resource on Moon anomalies, and their role in The Plan, an intriguing memetic engineering hypothesis implicating NASA, the Hollywood-12 and possible future global catastrophes.


Man on Moon or Pie in Sky?

Wired reporter Katie Dean talks with Lunargate! conspiracy theorists Ralph Rene and David S. Percy during the 30th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing. Excellent rebuttal by NASA officials is included in the article text.


The Apollo Moon Landings – Were They All A Hoax?

Excellent skeptical Lunargate! site examines the theories of Bill Kaysing and the irrationality of conspiracy researchers. Contains indepth analysis of NASA photos and other relevant documents.


Mike Bara’s Lunar Anomalies

Mike Bara traces Lunargate and Lunar Anomalies across occult history, covering everything from John Dee to Hyperdimensional Physics. Seek the mysteries!


Narduar vs. Bill Kaysing

Narduar The Human Serviette gets the scoop from Bill Kaysing about the alleged murder of Mercury astronaut Gus Grissom; ex-Ghelen Nazis working for NASA under Operation: Paperclip; faked photos and Nevada desert soundstages; the Apollo 13 film as propaganda and the legendary TV confrontation with astronaut Buzz Aldrin.

We Never Went to the Moon!

Frederick ‘Fog’ Horne’s controversial site features basic introductory information on Lunargate conspiracy theories. Make sure you check out his other columns.


Who Mourns For Apollo?


Many Lunargate believers use photo and document analysis techniques to “prove” their arguments. This article, written by Mike Bara with Steve Troy and Richard C. Hoagland, shows why these arguments are wrong, and in many cases, just plain stupid. “While we remain fiercely critical of the NASA hierarchy in general and certain members of the Apollo team in particular, we should not let that get in the way of our undying admiration for the rank and file men and women, scientists and engineers, who pulled off the most amazing feat in human history — the Apollo program.”


Aulis Publishers

Publishers of the excellent book Dark Moon: Apollo and The Whistle-Blowers, this site includes book excerpts, an online shop, reviews and links.


Was it Only a Paper Moon?

The late James Collier was a leading proponent of Lunargate. Learn about his research and purchas his video here.


Moon Shot: The Apollo Page and Links

An interesting collection of NASA photos and “anomalous” images. Suggests that Lunargate is evidence of intertextuality: multiple different “readings” of a text, and a media culture that relies on montage.


World of the Strange

MJ-12, the Men in Black and Hollow Earth theories: excellent background to moon hoaxes and NASA conspiracies. Check out other issues of this excellent newsletter.


Apollo Oxygen and Two-Gas Environment Problems

David Wozney has compiled materials relating to the aftermath of the Apollo 1 spacecraft fire that killed astronauts Grissom, Chaffee and White. Other anomalies Wozney explores include exhaust, crosshair and photographic image inconsistencies.


Global Shadow Government Masonic New World Order Conspiracy

Excellent list of links to articles on the proposed Illuminati-Masonic-NASA hoaxed moon landing conspiracy. Topics include John Glenn, Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry and the Sirius-Orion-Giza connection.


The Groom Lake Desert Rat

NASA, Groom Lake, Alpha Draconis, Hungarian UFOs, Alien Hygiene and more. With an explosive cocktail of memes like this, who could resist?

The Dark Side of the Moon Landings

This Fortean Times article (#94), by David Percy, analyzes NASA photos and footage, taken during 1969-72, and finds them wanting.


Percy and the Astro-Nots

This Fortean Times article (#97), by Bob Pickard, examines the Fortean mail received after David Percy analyzed NASA photos and footage. James Oberg, a flight operations engineer with the Shuttle program, says, “It’s always a delight to see the latest variation on the Moon fake myth and to examine the creative ways people can mislead themselves and others.”


Aliens on the Moon?

A subgenere of the Lunargate! conspiracy theories is the possibility that certain moon geological structures may have been artificially created. This site features substantial links and photographic image analysis by specialists of regions, including Clementine, Sinus Medii, Mare Crisium and the Sea of Tranquility.


NightWatch: Faked Moon Landings?

Clear discussion of the NASA photograph anomalies that conspiracy theorists claim prove that the Apollo moon landings were faked.


Libery Exposure: Nasa And The Moon

Interesting collection of documents relating to Van Allen Belt radiation; Masonic Apollo mission astronauts; Richard Hoagland’s Mars conspiracy and suggested links between NASA and military “black projects.”


Luna: Our Mysterious Neighbour

JJ Mercieca’s Malta UFO Research page includes an informative list of links to sites and reports examining the possible existence of artificial (alien) geological structures on the lunar surface. Includes revealing coverage of the infamous ‘blacked out’ conference by Richard Hoagland at the National Press Club: were the astronauts among alien ruins?


An Out of This World Conspiracy

Considers the theories of Bill Kaysing, Rene and Richard Hoagland. Useful summary or introductory material. Check out the rest of the ‘Bogus Science’ topics.


NASA Masonic Conspiracy: Apollo Missions Masonic Symbols

Thoughts from controversial conspiracy theorist William Cooper on Masonic links with NASA and the Apollo moon missions. Never let the facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory!


Half a Century of The German Moonbase: 1942 to 1992

“Everything NASA has told the world about the Moon is a lie and it was done to keep the exclusivity of the club from joining by Third World countries. All these physical conditions make it a lot more easier to build a Moon base. Ever since their first day of landing on the Moon, the Germans started boring – and tunneling under the surface and by the end of the war there was a small Nazi research base on the Moon.”


Reporter Says E.T. Life Exists

Posting from the Free Republic site on UFO researcher Linda Moulton Howe, and her allegations about cover-up by government officials.


Bill Kaysing Lawsuit

Information from the Houston Press newspaper about Bill Kaysing’s unsuccessful lawsuit against NASA astronaut James Lovell, who labelled him a “wacko.”


Battle of the Harvest Moon

Details imaginary Cold War battles between the US and USSR. on the lunar surface with particle beam weapons.


Fake Moon Landings: A Hoax

Site devoted to the writings of NASA Mooned America author Rene. Basically, an advertisement for his books, and ordering details.

USA’s Global Military Dominance: Real Reason for Sanctions Against Iran


by Eric Sommer


Published: Feb. 15, 2010 – Pravda.ru -


The U.S.-sponsored drive to impose new economic sanctions on Iran has nothing to do with the noble cause of limiting proliferation of nuclear weapons on the planet. It is directly linked to the U.S. military doctrine of establishing ‘full spectrum dominance’ – i.e., military dominance on land, sea, air, and outer space over all other countries in the world. The logical extension of this doctrine is that only countries firmly allied to the U.S. government should be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons or to even develop the capacity to do so.


Israel , for example, is widely-believed to hold secret Nuclear weapons. Yet there is no call for sanctions or investigations of them. The reason is simple: They are a U.S. ally. India and Pakistan have declined to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and have developed nuclear weapons. Yet there is no call for sanctions or investigations of them. The reason is simple: They are U.S. allies.



Iran and North Korea are being subjected to economic sanctions, calls for more sanctions, and even threats of military aggression against them. The reason is again simple: They are not U.S. allies.


The principal of national sovereignty includes non-interference in a nations internal affairs by outside powers. It is an important cornerstone of real international peace and security, and among other things is related to accepting and respecting the cultural, political, and economic diversity of the world.


A key element of national sovereignty is that wars of aggression against other nations which have not attacked ones’ own nation are prohibited under international law. Wars of aggression were declared illegal at the Nuremberg trials after World War II, which established the invasion of other nations by Germany as the type-case.


Subsequently, the United Nations General Assembly has enacted resolutions prohibiting military aggression, invasions, and occupations of one country by another – except in self-defence when the target nation had attacked first.


Iran , at this point, is only known to be developing nuclear power plants and materials. And it has never attacked the U.S. Yet Iran is being subjected to sanctions, calls for more sanctions, and threats of possible military aggression against them.


The Truth About the Non-Proliferation Treaty


As a signatory of the U.N. Nuclear non-proliferation treaty, Iran must not develop nuclear weapons.


However – and this is a crucial point – the non-proliferation treaty gives every signatory the sovereign right to voluntarily withdraw from the treaty on three months notice. After doing so, that country has the absolute right under international law to develop nuclear weapons on its own territory.


North Korea , which originally signed the treaty and later withdrew, has now the legal right to develop nuclear weapons. India, Pakistan, and Israel never signed the treaty and therefore also have had the legal right to develop nuclear weapons.


Instead of acknowledging these realities, western politicians and media have systematically concealed them from the public. In place of the truth they have repeated vague mantras like ‘defying the international community’ (i.e., not bending to the will of the U.S.).


In a typical example of this deceptive rhetoric, U.S. President Obama said a few days ago: “Despite the posturing that its nuclear power is only for civilian use … they in fact continue to pursue a course that would lead to weaponization, and that is not acceptable to the international community.”


The absence of any legal argument in this statement reflects the fact that there is no legal argument against Iran’s nuclear energy program, and that even development of weapons would be legal if Iraq withdraws from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty. Of course, Obama invoking the ‘non-acceptance by the ‘international community’ does not mean the nations of the world; it’s code for ‘the U.S. and its allies’.


U.S. Sanctions are part of Imperialism


To fully understand U.S. policy towards Iran and North Korea, we need to situate it in the wider attempt to extend its military machine across the world, and to remove any obstacles to its dominance.


There are currently 700 U.S. military bases outside the U.S., and it is engaged in a vast project to extend the reach of Nato by incorporating as many as possible of the former East European socialist states and former parts of the Soviet Union.


The U.S. is also seeking to militarily encircle both Russia and China with sea-based missile carrying ships, bases in neighboring states, hi-tech weapons on Taiwan, and the arming of small client anti-Russian states like Georgia. U.S. bases are also being built in the South American country of Columbia, right next door to Venezuela, a country which has sought to develop a socialist alternative to U.S. domination of the region.


U.S. opposition to Iran’s nuclear program is intended to help ensure that the U.S. – and its nuclear armed major allies such as Britain, France, India, and Pakistan – can continue to dominate the world. It is also intended to weaken the ability of middle eastern countries to resist U.S. domination in their region.


Source: http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/112215-0/


nwoobserver

febbraio 15, 2010

Zbigniew Brzezinski: Evil Spirit of 5 US Presidents – And Biggest Threat to World Peace


by Anders - Feb. 07, 2010 – Euro-med.dk -

Summary: There is a man who is more dangerous to mankind than any other living person today. His name is Zbigniew Brzezinski, a CFR-member , Arch-Trilateral Commissionist, Bilderberger. He has been the evil spirit behind 5 US presidents, including Obama – and he is obsessed with but one thought: The US is to dominate a communist one world state. For that purpose, he sees Eurasia as his grand chessboard, where the battle is to be won. Like any chessplayer, he starts by occupupying the centre of the chessboard, Central Asia. He wants peace there, friendly arrangements, in particular with China, if possible, so that he can pursue the goal of his obsession, i.e the purpose of the Trilateral Commission created by him and David Rockefeller: To create a world state by fusing a coming North American Union, at which he is working through the CSIS, the Union for the Mediterranean – and a Far East block which is now being created. His aim is a communist one world state where Russia, which he hates, is subdued by being split into 3 republics in a loose confederation – and if that is not possible – then ultimately even by WW III. He and David Rockefeller are behind the fusion of world religions for peace in the world state. In stead he collaborates with Al Gore and Gorbachev to promote the environmental Gaia religion. In the Agenda 21 state people in the technetronic era will be totally controlled and via artificial intelligence (brain chipping) become posthuman robots. He has worked on selling US infrastructure like harbours, outsourcing US jobs, giving the Panama Canal to the Chinese, selling illegal weapons to the Soviet, Iran, Iraq, Libya. He nurtured the Taliban and Al Qaida and ignored Islamic fundamentalism. Advised by Zbigniew and his son, Ian, Obama is now encircling Russia and China, which has not been so cooperative as wanted by Zbigniew, with anti-ballistic missiles which can also be used to inactivate Russian and Chinese satellites, so as to hinder retaliation after a US first strike against the nuclear arsenals of those countries. Russia knows and is preparing for the possibility of having to deliver a preemptive attack – according to the chief of the Russian Joint Staff, Yuri Baluyevsky. These considerations are probably being accentuated by the fact that Russia can hardly afford a fresh weapons race. However, Brzezinski does not believe in Russia´s capacity to strike!



Who is Zbigniew Brzezinski?

Obama-BrzezinskiSee this video: Brzezinski is the promotor of a Communist Obama who is for a social change in the US and to end the Iraq war and redefines security.

I have previously written about him and his vision for the world: “
The Grand Chessboard”. Zbigniew Brzezinski has been called Obama´s Rasputin.


Patrick Briley 16 Sept. 2008: The following is very weird – and one wonders that one man has had so much influence on world affairs. Much of it is confirmed by Wikipedia.


Carter_zia_brzezinski_2050081722-20904Zbigniew Brzezinski is Barack Obama’s foreign policy advisor. Brzezenski was the national security advisor for President Carter from 1977 to 1981. In 1988 he endorsed HW Bush for President and was Co-Chair of the HW Bush national security advisory task force. From 1987 to 1989 he also served on the HW Bush’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. Clinton Secretary of State Madeline Albright was a student of Brzezenski´s. GW Bush Secretary of State, Condi Rice (also a former national security advisor), who studied under Albright’s father, shares many of the same world government views with Brzezinski and Albright.


Zbigniew Brzezinski is an advocate of socialist world government, a goal he has promoted as a member of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) to “guide policy makers” and as a speaker at former Soviet Premier and Communist Mikhail Gorbachev’s first World Forum. This State of the World Forum had interesting partners. Brzezinski is an architect of creating regions of global governance from independent nations to achieve world government. The CSIS issues the North American Integration Monitor, which hopes for a North American Union (NAU).


The proposals for global taxes by Obama have come with the recommendations of Zbigniew Brzezinski-obama-david-rockefellerBrzezinski to pay for globalization and world government. Obama has proposed a global poverty tax in a US Senate bill. The Climate Change Control Bill strongly supported by Obama calls for an international governing regime to monitor and regulate carbon dioxide and “carbon footprints” from discovery, to production, to consumption at a cost of $50 trillion globally and at a cost of $8 trillion for US taxpayers, all to be paid for by a global tax, whose monies will be used to establish a world government body.


Left: Obama´s puppeteers, the Trilateral Commissionists, Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller.


Obama, Brzezinski and Al Gore have worked closely with Communist backed environmental fronts led by Gorbachev (proponent of Earth Charter, author of Manifesto for Earth), to promote the falsehood of significant global climate change due to manmade sources of greenhouse gases to scare the world and the US into paying such a global tax to “save the planet.”

Obama’s longstanding ties with Communist, Marxist and Islamic terror mentors in the US have been well documented in the US and world press. What many do not know but need to know is that Zbigniew Brzezinski represents another one of these Islamic terror, socialistic, world government and Marxist mentors of Obama´s.


Brzezinski openly praises Marxism in his book Between Two Ages published in 1970 - in which he desribes man´s behaviour and mind to be totally controlled, people having artificial intelligence (brain chipping) in a “technetronic” dictatorship. Incidentally Brzezenski’s father was an ambassador to Russia from Poland during Stalin’s reign and Zbigniew worked to protect and defend some East German intelligence agents of Stasi some of whose former members later worked to enable the 9/11 hijackers and other Islamic terrorists (Hamburg cell of Atta, Alshehhi and Jarrah – hardly correct). Brzezinski has dual US and Polish citizenship.


Council on Foreign Relations member, Bilderberger, Zbigniew Brzezinski co-founded the Trilateral Commission (TC) with David Rockefeller in 1973 and was its first director. Brzezinski selected Jimmy Carter as a member while Carter was the governor of Georgia and before Carter became US President. TC is the primary organization managing the goals of globalization toachieve world government via manipulations of economies, politics and religions of nations around the world including the US.


According to Dr. Dennis Cuddy, Brzezinski, as TC director, advocated, in a 1973 memo, establishing means for social control over the world populations by deliberate “economic and political destabilization” so that later the debt leash could be used to “strangle a rebellious nation into submission (to global governance).”



The TC, Rice and Brzezenski have actively promoted illegal immigration
and non-enforcement of US immigration laws to advance the NAU. They have promoted foreign control of the US by facilitating the sell off of US infrastructure and companies to foreign governments including those from the EU, China, Russia and Islamic terror nations.


Brzezinski, Rice, the TC and their socialist friends have intentionally helped destabilize the US economy by devaluating the US dollar through the sending of US jobs overseas.They are trying to control the US energy economy via the Climate Change Control bills and to prevent US energy independence (which would stop the devaluation of the dollar) by calling for curtailing and drastically controlling production of oil. Zbigniew Brzezinski’s contrived leash is not limited just to money and capital; it includes controlling populations, and nations by controlling their jobs, their immigration, their food, their water, their energy, their politicians and governments, and their religions.


The world government socialists like Brzezinski and Obama are promoting a “new order of religions,” an amalgamation of religions to unify and control populations and nations. They are including in their new order umbrella of religions Islamic aspirations for a world caliphate, Communitarianistic and New Age beliefs, the Gaia (“mother” Earth) religion of environmentalists exploited by the Communists, by Al Gore (the tree hugger) and by those who worship the created rather than the Creator.


Brzezinski worked with Republican globalists like Kissinger and US Senator Henry Bellmon (OK) to give the Panama Canal away ultimately for Communist Chinese control (Carter-Torrijos Treaties). Under Carter, Brzezinski was responsible for the severing of direct US recogniton of Taiwan as an independent nation and recognizing only Communist China.


As soon as Carter became President Brzezinski started to illegally manipulate the export control list to enable advanced US computer, military (guidance systems), energy (nuclear; coal, oil shale, tar sands conversion and synthetic fuels) technologies to be transferred and sold by US companies (such as Control Data, GE and Union Carbide) to the Soviet Union.


Brzezinski + bin ladenBrzezinski with Osama bin Laden during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan!On February 2, 1979, Brzezinski wrote a memo to Carter falsely claiming that Islamic fundamentalism was not an imminent threat and would not gain prominence in the Middle East. Brzezinski was the architect of the formation of US CIA and Saudi training and funding for the Afghan mujaheddin network, some of which would later form the Taliban and would shelter Al Qaeda terrorists camps. Brzezinski, along with Clinton’s NSC advisor Anthony Lake, John McCain, Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich, was a proponent of using the Saudis and CIA to directly fund the AlQaeda and Iranian arming and training in and outside the US of Islamic terrrorists from Albania, Kosvo and Bosnia to kick out the Serbs and Croats. Some of these same terrorists became the 9/11 hijackers?? Carter and Bzezinski are and have been “diplomats at large” along with Boren for Hamas terrorists in the Middle East and US as reflected in Obama’s pro-Islamic foreign policies.


Zeit Kritiker: Brzezinski is Obama´s puppeteer.

Even during the tenure of G.W. Bush, Brzezinski took over key sectors of the U.S. government. Since then, the danger of a confrontation between the United States with Russia, China, Sudan, Pakistan and more recently with Iran and Yemen has highly increased.The aggression of the U.S. toward Iran, ultimately aims at a confrontation with Russia and China.


The Grand Chessboard“The Grand Chessborad” dissipates any doubt: The US is to dominate all Eurasia. Then American high finance would in effect be in control of 70 percent of the oil and gas reserves - in order to secure American primacy for a long time. With Obama as a puppet of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller see this goal within reach.


Moscow is well aware of this situation, the fear of Brzezinski’s finger on the nuclear button does not leave Russia inactive: The Chief of the Russian General Staff, Yury Baluyevsky announced in January 2008, “Russia would revise its nuclear doctrine, so that a nuclear first strike in certain situations would be possible.” (WG Tarpley, Barack Obama - How a U.S. President is Made p. 166).

Brzezinski and his followers are so obsessed with America as the sole superpower that they are willing to take the risk of World War III. That should be clear to everyone.


Brzezinski´s Grand Chessboard: Eurasia

Brzezinski: A Geostrategy for Eurasia Foreign Affairs September/October 1997.


Article read here: A power that dominated Eurasia would exercise decisive influence over two of the world’s three most economically productive regions. A glance at the map also suggests that a country dominant in Eurasia would almost automatically control the Middle East and Africa. With Eurasia now serving as the decisive geopolitical chessboard.


Brzezinski wants understanding with China – and wants to weaken Russia by splitting her into 3 republics.

Bush-obama-opium-bombeAny expansion of Europe’s political scope is automatically an expansion of U.S. influence. America must be careful not to alienate Turkey. America should use its influence in Europe to encourage Turkey’s eventual admission to the EU. In addition, it is not in America’s interest to perpetuate U.S.-Iranian hostility. The core of the new transcontinental security framework could be a standing committee composed of the major Eurasian powers, with America, Europe, China, Japan, a confederated Russia, and India collectively addressing critical issues for Eurasia’s stability.

Comment
: This is the idea of the Trilateral Commission founded by Brzezinski and David Rockefeller



Brzezinki´s legacy

Trend 26 Jan. 2009 Brzezinski told Polish Radio that there are no other options than aggression when dealing with Moscow, speaking of the anti-missile shield.

Global Research 3 Febr. 2010 With or without Brzezinski´s advise, Obama is now provoking both Russia, China and Iran by sale of of sophisticated ground-to-air missiles to Poland, various weaponry for Taiwan and anti-missile defence systems to 4 Gulf States. A fresh provokation against Russia was reported on 5 Febr. by the EUObserver: The US will set up its anti missile shield (against Iran?) in Romania and in the Black Sea

Global Res. 5 Febr. 2010: These same Army Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) systems are going to be deployed in Taiwan as the U.S. continues its military encirclement of China. U.S. PAC-3 systems have already been deployed in Japan and South Korea. News that the U.S. is about to deploy a PAC-3 missile battery in Poland led Russia’s ambassador to NATO, Dmitry Rogozin, to recently state: “Do they really think that we will calmly watch the location of a rocket system, at a distance of 60 km from Kaliningrad?”


The official authorization of Patriot transfers to Taiwan – the missiles are produced by Raytheon Company headquartered in Massachusetts, whose former vice president of Government Operations and Strategy William Lynn is now Obama’s Deputy Secretary of Defense – resulted in China’s vice foreign minister, He Yafei, saying “We believe this move endangers China’s national security.”The strategy is clear. Surround Russia and China with mobile “missile defense” systems whose job is to take out their retaliatory capability after a U.S. first-strike against their nuclear weapons. All this means one thing – an extended arms race with Brzezinski2Russia and China which will mean huge profits for the weapons industry. And Brzezinski? Global Res. 15 Aug. 2008 Obama’s foreign policy team in addition to father Zbigniew Brzezinski, includes Brzezinski’s son, Ian Brzezinski, current US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for European and NATO Affairs. Ian Brzezinski is a devout backer of US missile defense policy, as well as Kosovo independence and NATO expansion into Ukraine and Georgia.


The Brzezinskis. Ian Brzezinski left. They are a mortal danger to the world.


Comment

Bzrezinski´s big idea is the necessity for the USA to dominate the world. He will do so by means of his child, the Trilateral Commission´s, aim, i.e. fusioning a North American Union, which he is creating through the CSIS, the Union for the Mediterranean and an East Asian bloc, which is being constructed.

US domination of Eurasia is a must. Therefore, US is now occupying the centre of the chessboard, Central Asia
– at any cost, even World War III. And he might have it soon in case Russia and China are unable to participate in a new armament race.Rocket


He underestimates Russia as a nuclear power capable of delivering a first strike catastrophically. Unauthorized Obama biographer, Webster Tarpley, says on this video that Bzrezinski will spare Iran and use the US forces in a war against Russia!! Here Tarpley tells about Brzezinski admitting on French TV, that he lured the Soviet Union to invade Afghanistan. Islamic fundamentalism as a threat to the world: “Nonsense” says Brzezinski. He is willing to use any means to provoke war with Russia, which he hates. Here is a view that supports him: AG Friedensforschung der Universität Kassel: “What course of events would history take if American and european geo-politicians – without taking the new diestribution of power into consideration – would, in fact, stick to the plan of primacy in Eurasia? In this case a clash between different great powers would occur – wheter as a cold or a hot war.” This may be what US Vice-President, Joe Biden, and Colin Powell meant. In fact, after the Georgian-Russian war, Brzezinski did see Russia as a military hindrance to US Dominance in Eurasia – video.


Source: http://euro-med.dk/?p=13551


febbraio 12, 2010

Yemen and The Militarization of Strategic Waterways

Securing US Control over Socotra Island and the Gulf of Aden


by Michel Chossudovsky

Published: Feb. 07, 2010 – Global Research


The Yemeni archipelago of Socotra in the Indian Ocean is located some 80 kilometres off the Horn of Africa and 380 kilometres South of the Yemeni coastline. The islands of Socotra are a wildlife reserve recognized by (UNESCO), as a World Natural Heritage Site.


Socotra is at the crossroads of the strategic naval waterways of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden (See map below). It is of crucial importance to the US military.


One of the objectives of Washington’s agenda is to militarize major sea ways. This strategic waterway links the Mediterranean to South Asia and the Far East, through the Suez Canal, the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. It is a major transit route for oil tankers. A large share of China’s industrial exports to Western Europe transits through this strategic waterway. Maritime trade from East and Southern Africa to Western Europe also transits (within a short distance of Socotra )(Suqutra), through the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea. (see map below). A military base in Socotra would oversee the movement of vessels including war ships in an out of the Gulf of Aden.




Sea Power


From a military standpoint, the Socotra archipelago is at a strategic location. Socotra is some 3000 km from the US naval base of Diego Garcia, which is among America’s largest overseas military facilities.


On January 2nd, 2010, President Saleh and General David Petraeus, Commander of the US Central Command met for high level discussions behind closed doors.


The Saleh-Petraeus meeting was casually presented by the media as a timely response to the foiled Detroit Christmas bomb attack on Northwest flight 253. It had apparently been scheduled on an ad hoc basis as a means to coordinating counter-terrorism initiatives directed against “Al Qaeda in Yemen”, including “the use [of] American drones and missiles on Yemen lands.”


Several reports, however, confirmed that the Saleh-Petraeus meetings were intent upon redefining US military involvement in Yemen including the establishment of a full-fledged military base on the island of Socotra. Yemen’s president Ali Abdullah Saleh was reported to have “surrendered Socotra for Americans who would set up a military base, pointing out that U.S. officials and the Yemeni government agreed to set up a military base in Socotra to counter pirates and al-Qaeda.” (Fars News. January 19, 2010)


On January 1st, one day before the Saleh-Petraeus meetings in Sanaa, General Petraeus confirmed in a Baghdad press conference that “security assistance” to Yemen would more than double (from 70 to more than 150 million dollars) (Scramble for the Island of Bliss: Socotra!, War in Iraq, January 12, 2010. See also CNN January 9, 2010). This doubling of military aid to Yemen was presented to World public opinion as a response to the Detroit bomb incident, which allegedly had been ordered by Al Qaeda operatives in Yemen.


The establishment of an air force base on the island of Socotra was described by the US media as part of the “Global war on Terrorism”:


“Among the new programs, Saleh and Petraeus agreed to allow the use of American aircraft, perhaps drones, as well as “seaborne missiles”–as long as the operations have prior approval from the Yemenis, according to a senior Yemeni official who requested anonymity when speaking about sensitive subjects. U.S. officials say the island of Socotra, 200 miles off the Yemeni coast, will be beefed up from a small airstrip [under the jurisdiction of the Yemeni military] to a full base in order to support the larger aid program as well as battle Somali pirates. Petraeus is also trying to provide the Yemeni forces with basic equipment such as up-armored Humvees and possibly more helicopters.” (Newsweek, Newsweek, January 18, 2010, emphasis added)




Existing runway built by Soviet Union during Cold War era.



US Naval Facility?


The proposed US Socotra military facility, however, is not limited to an air force base. A US naval base has also been contemplated.


The development of Socotra’s naval infrastructure was already in the pipeline. Barely a few days prior (December 29, 2009) to the Petraeus-Saleh discussions (January 2, 2010), the Yemeni cabinet approved a $41 million loan by Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development (KFAED) in support of the development of Socotra’s seaport project.




The Great Game


The Socotra archipelago is part of the Great Game opposing Russia and America.


During the Cold War, the Soviet Union had a military presence in Socotra, which at the time was part of South Yemen.


Barely a year ago, the Russians entered into renewed discussions with the Yemeni government regarding the establishment of a Naval base on Socotra island. A year later, in January 2010, in the week following the Petraeus-Saleh meeting, a Russian Navy communiqué “confirmed that Russia did not give up its plans to have bases for its ships… on Socotra island.” (DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia), January 25, 2010)


The Petraeus-Saleh January 2, 2010 discussions were crucial in weakening Russian diplomatic overtures to the Yemeni government.


The US military has had its eye on the island of Socotra since the end of the Cold War.


In 1999, Socotra was chosen “as a site upon which the United States planned to build a signal intelligence system….” Yemeni opposition news media reported that “Yemen’s administration had agreed to allow the U.S. military access to both a port and an airport on Socotra.” according to the opposition daily Al-Haq, “a new civilian airport built on Socotra to promote tourism had conveniently been constructed in accordance with U.S. military specifications.” (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Pennsylvania), October 18, 2000)


The Militarization of the Indian Ocean


The establishment of a US military base in Socotra is be part of the broader process of the militarization of the Indian Ocean, of linking the Diego Garcia military base in the Chagos archipelago to Socotra and the Gulf of Aden.


The US Navy’s geostrategist Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan had intimated, prior to World War, that “whoever attains maritime supremacy in the Indian Ocean would be a prominent player on the international scene.” (Indian Ocean and our Security).


What was at stake in Mahon’s writings was the strategic control by the US of major Ocean sea ways.



Michel Chossudovsky is Professor of Economics (Emeritus) at the University of Ottawa and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal, which hosts the award winning website: www.globalresearch.ca . He is the author of the international best-seller “The Globalisation of Poverty and The New World Order”. He is contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica, member of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission and recipient of the Human Rights Prize of the Society for the Protection of Civil Rights and Human Dignity (GBM), Berlin, Germany. His writings have been published in more than twenty languages.


Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17460

by nwoobserver.wordpress.com

Why the CIA is the World’s Number One Terrorist Organization (With Video)


by Len Hart


Published: Feb. 04, 2010 – The Existentialist Cowboy


The time has come to abolish the CIA –t into a thousand pieces –as JFK had promised! Its leadership should be dismissed and investigated. Where there is probable cause, CIA members should be investigated and tried for crimes against humanity.


The CIA, itself a ruthless, terrorist organization inspires terrorism in response. In some cases, notably the CIA and al Qaeda, the relationship between the CIA and terrorism is symbiotic. The CIA perpetuates an “American Holocaust”, the deaths of some 6 million people from its inception to the year 1987. For as Long as the CIA Exists, the US will never be safe from terrorism. It has long been time to realize JFK’s dream of smashing the CIA into a ‘thousand pieces’.



    CIA operations follow the same recurring script. First, American business interests abroad are threatened by a popular or democratically elected leader. The people support their leader because he intends to conduct land reform, strengthen unions, redistribute wealth, nationalize foreign-owned industry, and regulate business to protect workers, consumers and the environment. So, on behalf of American business, and often with their help, the CIA mobilizes the opposition. First it identifies right-wing groups within the country (usually the military), and offers them a deal: “We’ll put you in power if you maintain a favorable business climate for us.” The Agency then hires, trains and works with them to overthrow the existing government (usually a democracy).–Steve Kangas, A Timeline of CIA Atrocities


Pakistan is a case in point.


    Since 9/11, the Bush administration has been propping up Musharraf’s military regime with $3.6 billion in economic aid from the US and a US-sponsored consortium, not to mention $900 million in military aid and the postponement of overdue debt repayments totaling $13.5 billion. But now the administration is debating whether Musharraf has become too dependent on Islamic extremist political parties in Pakistan to further US interests, and whether he should be pressured to permit the return of two exiled former prime ministers, Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, who have formed an electoral alliance to challenge him in presidential elections scheduled for next year.–Pakistan: Friend or Foe? The US shouldn’t prop up President Musharraf’s military regime, Selig S. Harrison

The late Benazir Bhutto revealed the truth before she was brutally gunned down in the streets of Karachi: US policy causes world terrorism. Conveniently for ‘official terrorists, she died before she could tell the rest of the story.


    When the United States aligns with dictatorships and totalitarian regimes, it compromises the basic democratic principles of its foundation — namely, life, liberty and justice for all. Dictatorships such as Musharraf’s suppress individual rights and freedoms and empower the most extreme elements of society. Oppressed citizens, unable to represent themselves through other means, often turn to extremism and religious fundamentalism.Benazir Bhutto, A False Choice for Pakistan

A favorite CIA tactic is the CIA “front”.


    The May 12 terrorist attacks on the al Hamra, Jadawal and Vinnell compounds in the Saudi Arabian capital, Riyadh, which killed more than 90 people, were not merely assaults on “symbols” of the imperialist West. The bombers were also intent on weakening the rule of Saudi royal family.While the timing of the bombings in Saudi Arabia and in other countries — just hours before US Secretary of State Colin Powell arrived in Saudi Arabia — suggested a coordinated assault on US targets, the bombings in Riyadh were targeted at key props of the reactionary regime.All three Saudi Arabian targets were associated with Saudi Arabia’s role as a US client state: residential compounds housing mainly expatriates working in the country, the offices of the Vinnell Corporation and the residences of its employees.Vinnell, founded in California in 1931, first gained a foothold in Saudi Arabia in 1975. An article by Matt Gaul in the June 1998 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, revealed that it was the culmination of a close relationship between the corporation, the US military and Washington’s intelligence agencies. This relationship stretched back to the end of World War II, when the US government used the company to ship supplies to the China’s counter-revolutionary party, the Kuomintang.During the 1950s and ’60s, Vinnell constructed US military airfields in Japan, Okinawa, Taiwan, Thailand and southern Vietnam. According to Gaul, it was during this period that Albert Vinnell, the corporation’s founder, “offered his staff’s services to the [CIA], and several CIA agents used employment with Vinnell as cover for operations in Africa and the Middle East”.

    – Rohan Pearce, CIA front targeted in terrorist attacks, 28 May 2003


How does the CIA do it?


    It uses every trick in the book: propaganda, stuffed ballot boxes, purchased elections, extortion, blackmail, sexual intrigue, false stories about opponents in the local media, infiltration and disruption of opposing political parties, kidnapping, beating, torture, intimidation, economic sabotage, death squads and even assassination. These efforts culminate in a military coup, which installs a right-wing dictator. The CIA trains the dictator’s security apparatus to crack down on the traditional enemies of big business, using interrogation, torture and murder. The victims are said to be “communists,” but almost always they are just peasants, liberals, moderates, labor union leaders, political opponents and advocates of free speech and democracy. Widespread human rights abuses follow.–Steve Kangas, A Timeline of CIA Atrocities

The CIA uses all those methods to install dictators like Musharraf, whom it most certainly trained. The CIA is ruthless in its on-going efforts to eliminate with torture and murder, in necessary, all opposition to the interests of American imperialists. Saddam Hussein was among the dictators propped up by the US, the CIA specifically. Saddam ran afoul of Bush Sr by opposing efforts by the Bush regime to keep the price of oil high. The transcript of US Ambassador April Glaspie’s interview with Hussein on the eve of his invasion of Kuwait proves conclusively that Hussein had been set up by the master spy –George Bush Sr. The CIAs allegiance to the US oil industry is overt and is most certainly at the very heart of well-founded suspicions about the CIA, Texas oil barons, and JFK. Dealy Plaza is said to have been the nexus of all three!


The origins of Bush’s war in Iraq may be found in the Arab Oil embargo of the 1970s.


    Three decades ago, in the throes of the energy crisis, Washington’s hawks conceived of a strategy for US control of the Persian Gulf’s oil. Now, with the same strategists firmly in control of the White House, the Bush administration is playing out their script for global dominance.In the geopolitical vision driving current US policy toward Iraq, the key to national security is global hegemony — dominance over any and all potential rivals. To that end, the United States must not only be able to project its military forces anywhere, at any time. It must also control key resources, chief among them oil — and especially Gulf oil.–Robert Dreyfuss, Mother Jones

JFK promised to “smash the CIA into a thousand pieces”. Bill Clinton, on the 50th anniversary of “the company”, defended it with an absurdity that one might have expected from the GOP! Americans, Clinton said, don’t know or understand what the CIA does and should, therefore, lay off!


Out not knowing what the CIA is up to is precisely the problem. Bill Clinton is as dead wrong on this issue as Barack Obama is dead wrong about Ronald Reagan. Both positions are premised upon the idea that the American people are stupid and those that are not ought to be! The fact is: the CIA is out of control and they will continue to get away with it as long as the American people are either ignorant, kept in the dark, or both! The CIA is unaccountable and because it is, it remains a cancerous source of unchecked corruption and most certainly the inspiration for generations of American hating terrorists who will fight back in kind!


Much has been written about the CIA’s operations, [The Modus Operandi of the CIA] by insiders and outsiders. One insider who has chronicled what he witnessed in the CIA is Ralph McGehee. He worked for the CIA from 1952 until 1977 and now writes about intelligence matters, notably the book Deadly Deceits — My 25 years in the CIA (New York: Sheridan Square Press, 1983). He has compiled a computer data base on CIA activities. Persons interested may write to him at: 422 Arkansas Ave., Herndon, VA 22070. (See http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA/CIA_SOP.html .) Here are some excerpts of what he has written:


    “…it is essential to provide background on the scope and nature of its worldwide operations. Between 1961 and 1975 the Agency conducted 900 major or sensitive operations, and thousands of lesser covert actions. The majority of its operations were propaganda, election or paramilitary. Countries of major concern, such as Indonesia in the early 1960s, were usually subjected to the CIA’s most concerted attention. Critics of the CIA have aptly described the mainstays of such attention: “discrediting political groups… by forged documents that may be attributed to them. . . .” faking “communist weapon shipments,” capturing communist documents and then inserting forgeries prepared by the Agency’s Technical Services Division.–Ralph McGehee

Much of the rest of the world knows the truth about the CIA; Americans are kept in the dark. The media dare not tell the truth about the CIA and the Bush administration, in particular, is complicit. Rare media outlets that dare tell the truth are demonized. Writers and “liberal” activist Steve Kangas turned up dead just outside the office of Richard Mellon Scaife, the multi-billionaire about whom it is no stretch to say he coordinated and bankrolled the “vast right wing conspiracy” to impeach, remove and, in other ways, smear Bill Clinton.


As more documents are declassified and the hidden history is made painfully clear, the CIA’s predictable response is compared to the Medieval Church’s oppressive response to the Scientific Revolution. Indeed, there are many things about the CIAs relationship to the world around it that are medieval: intolerance, fear, repression, secrecy and torture. Initially, the CIA would merely harass American writers but foreign writers were tortured and/or murdered. With the death of Steve Kangas, one wonders if the CIA now operates against the domestic media. What’s next? An inquisition?


The CIA, whose very is name is enough to inspire generations of “terrorists”, has outlived its usefulness.




Source: http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2010/02/why-cia-is-worlds-number-one-terrorist.html

febbraio 09, 2010

OGM: punto di non ritorno?



di Marcello Pamio - 8 febbraio 2010 - www.disinformazione.it


Entro aprile 2010 gli ogm faranno il loro ingresso nell’agricoltura italiana. Parola del Consiglio di Stato!
Il più alto organo della “giustizia amministrativa” italiana, ha sentenziato il 19 gennaio 2010 (con sentenza depositata in Segreteria), almeno sulla carta, un punto a favore (e palla al centro) dei colossi del biotech.
I giudici amministrativi hanno accolto il ricorso di SILVANO DALLA LIBERA, vicepresidente dell’ Associazione Agricoltori Futuragra[1], un’associazione “culturale” di Vivaro a Pordenone, composta da circa 500 imprenditori agricoli che vogliono a tutti i costi coltivare gli ogm, in particolare il mais (Mon 810) della Monsanto (leggi Pfizer).
Il sito ufficiale di tale “associazione culturale”, è un poutporri di propaganda disinformativa in merito agli organismi geneticamente modificati.
“La sentenza è inappellabile - dichiara pubblicamente Silvano Dalla Libera - e la sua “mancata applicazione…creerebbe un danno enorme all’agricoltura italiana!
Il vicepresidente di Futuragra parla di danno all’agricoltura italiana se gli ogm verranno bloccati, e non parla invece del danno alla salute delle persone, se gli ogm entreranno nella catena alimentare diretta (visto che già ci entrano attraverso quella indiretta cioè l’alimentazione animale: il 92% dei mangimi per animali sono etichettati ogm[2])!

Facciamo un po’ di chiarezza per capire cosa è effettivamente avvenuto.
Silvano Dalla Libera nel 2007 si era rivolto al Tribunale dopo che il ministero delle Politiche agricole gli aveva negato l’autorizzazione alla semina di mais ogm, per la mancanza dei piani regionali di coesistenza. Dopo un primo pronunciamento del T.A.R. e un ricorso ora arriva la decisione finale del Consiglio di Stato.
Questo non significa assolutamente che gli agricoltori italiani possono e potranno seminare mais ogm!

È molto probabile e se lo augurano tutte le persone intelligenti e consapevoli che non hanno alcun interesse economico, che il Ministro LUCA ZAIA impedisca di fatto la coltivazione, visto che ben sei paesi dell’U.E., Francia, Germania, Austria, Ungheria, Grecia e Lussemburgo hanno bandito il mais transgenico Mon 810 della Monsanto.
Nonostante la maggioranza degli italiani (il 74%) sia contraria al cibo frankenstein, nonostante sempre più evidenze scientifiche tenute ovviamente nascoste, dimostrano che gli ogm non sono la panacea per la fame nel mondo, ma creano problemi seri di salute a terreni e consumatori, la domanda sorge spontanea: perché vogliono a tutti i costi farceli mangiare?
Certamente le pressioni economiche sono incommensurabili, e la politica, da che mondo e mondo, è alla mercè del potere finanziario. Non sbagliava il grande poeta statunitense EZRA POUND quando denunciava il servilismo della politica nei confronti dell’economia (“i politici sono i camerieri del potere economico”

BUSINNESS DA CAPOGIRO
La d.ssa MARINA MARIANI, agronoma, esperta in ogm e docente di legislazione e sicurezza alimentare al Politecnico del Commercio di Milano, a tal proposito ricorda che nel mondo gli ogm più coltivati sono prevalentemente sei: soia, mais, colza, cotone, riso e frumento. Oltre 125 milioni di ettari sparsi in 23 paesi, diffusi principalmente negli Stati Uniti, Argentina, Brasile, Canada, Cina e India.
Nonostante questo, a tirare le fila dell'immane mercato sono davvero in pochi: cinque colossi multinazionali, quali MONSANTO, DU PONT, SYNGENTA, BAYER CROP SCIENCE e DOW.
Da soli gestiscono il 35 percento del mercato mondiale delle sementi, alimenti base per il 50% della popolazione mondiale![3]
Un business da capogiro.

Le aziende interessate all’affaire ogm, non sono piccole società o ridicole associazioni pseudo culturali, ma i più potenti gruppi della chimica e farmaceutica planetaria, i quali speculano e guadagnano miliardi di dollari ogni anno non solo nelle sementi brevettate o nei pesticidi cancerogeni, ma soprattutto nella creazione di malati!
Nel solo mondo occidentale, il cosiddetto “mercato della malattia”, surclassa quello delle armi e del petrolio.
Noi tutti pensiamo che i mercati del petrolio e delle armi siano i più floridi, ma non è così nella realtà.
La malattia è il mercato più attraente che esista, anche perché oltre all’indubbio guadagno economico c’è anche il controllo delle masse: una persona ammalata non è libera!

Quindi da una parte ci mettono a disposizione:
- Sistemi di coltivazione velenosi e tossici per l’ambiente e quindi per l’uomo che a lungo andare indeboliscono la salute dei terreni e dell’uomo stesso, predisponendoci alle malattie;
- Sementi che muoiono ogni anno costringendo i coltivatori a comperarli a fine raccolto, rendendoli sempre più schiavi al Sistema monopolistico (vedi cosa sta accadendo nel mondo in paesi come India, Iraq e moltissimi altri;
- Alimenti modificati geneticamente che lentamente ma inesorabilmente avvelenano l’organismo animale e umano;

Punto a) e c)
Una volta che la popolazione è sempre più ammalata, le stesse corporation stenderanno gentilmente le mani offrendoci pillole, vaccini, esami, operazioni, farmaci contro quelle malattie da loro stesse create e incrementate a tavolino!!!

Punto b)
Quando dal punto di vista economico saranno strozzati tutti i coltivatori convinti, come quelli di Futuragra e anche quelli restii agli ogm, a causa dell’infestazione e diffusione a distanza delle spore, le corporation avranno nelle loro mani l’intera produzione di alimenti globale. Controllando la produzione alimentare avranno ovviamente il controllo della vita di centinaia di milioni di persone.

IL PROBLEMA DELLE SEMENTI
Molti lettori ricorderanno che nella gelida isola di Spitsbergen (leggi articolo completo), nel desolato arcipelago delle Svalbard stanno costruendo la superbanca delle sementi, destinata a conservare 3 milioni di varietà di piante di tutto il mondo. Una banca scavata nel granito, con chiusure a prova di bomba, sensori di movimento e una muraglia di cemento armato spessa un metro. Una specie di "Arca dell'Apocalisse".
Il grosso problema è che il finanziatore principale è la FONDAZIONE ROCKEFELLER assieme a Monsanto e Syngenta (i due colossi del biotech), la Pioneer Hi-Bred che studia ogm per la chimica DuPont e la Fondazione "Bill & Melissa Gates" di William III Gates il patron della Microsoft.
Di banche di sementi ne esistono almeno un migliaio in giro per le università del mondo, per l'esattezza, secondo la FAO sono 1400. Perché proprio questa?
Ricordiamo a questo punto le parole pronunciate da Henry Kissinger intorno agli anni '70: «Chi controlla il petrolio controlla il Paese; chi controlla il cibo, controlla la popolazione».
Il petrolio i Rockefeller lo controllavano all'inizio del secolo scorso con la Standard Oil, oggi lo controllano con il cartello petrolifero mondiale.
Quindi si stanno organizzando per controllare il cibo...

IL PROBLEMA DELL'ACQUA
Infine, ma non per importanza, c’è il grosso problema dell’acqua.
Le coltivazioni intensive, a differenza di quelle biodinamiche, hanno bisogno di grandi quantitativi di acqua: solamente la zootecnia e l’agricoltura divorano circa il 70% di tutta l’acqua del pianeta.
Un esempio per tutti: per produrre 1 tonnellata di mais, usato poi per alimentare poveri animali da macello, necessita di circa 1000 tonnellate di acqua!
Terreni aridi, pregni di sostanze chimiche come pesticidi, diserbanti ma privi dell’importantissimo e vitale humus, non assorbono correttamente l’acqua e quando piove tanto avviene quel fenomeno chiamato ruscellamento. In pratica l’acqua, che non viene assorbita correttamente dalla terra (per colpa dell’uomo), andrà a finire nelle falde acquifere portandosi dietro oltre al letame, pesticidi, diserbanti, crittogamici e quintali di farmaci (antibiotici, antistaminici, ormoni, beta-bloccanti, ecc.) dati agli animali.
Le falde acquifere dove noi tutti beviamo, compresi anche i 500 soci di Futuragra e le loro famiglie, non a caso è sempre più inquinata.

IL CONTROLLO GLOBALE
Quindi stiamo parlando di un progetto occulto di Controllo globale e non è quindi un problema solo economico.
Per ultimo ci sono i fenomeni meteorologici che si stanno sempre più estremizzando, con prolungati periodi di siccità e di piovosità, studiati a tavolino (vedi H.A.A.R.P. e scie chimiche) per causare massimi danni alle colture e spingere agricoltori e ministeri dei vari paesi verso colture apparentemente più resistenti e produttive[4].
In poche parole, il mondo intero sarà costretto a ricorrere ai sistemi ogm brevettati appositamente per noi dalle lobbies, strada senza ritorno che porterà alla scomparsa delle sementi autoctone riproducibili, in cambio di sementi penosamente sterili e alla dipendenza totale e schiavistica nei riguardi dei nuovi monopolisti.[5]

COSA POSSIAMO FARE?
E’ arrivato il momento di svegliarci da questo sonno profondo, di muoverci per evitare l’inevitabile, anche perché se dovessero entrare gli ogm nelle coltivazioni tradizionali, difficilmente potremo tornare indietro, proprio a causa della loro enorme e veloce infestazione.
Organizziamo convegni, congressi per sensibilizzare le popolazioni e i coltivatori ignari dell’importanza di una alimentazione sana e quindi del pericolo di una alimentazione basata su organismi geneticamente modificati, soprattutto nella dieta dei bambini.
Incoraggiamo la nascita e/o aiutiamo la diffusione dei Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale (G.A.S.) e dei seedsavers, cioè dei gruppi di scambio sementi biologiche, perché se scompariranno le sementi autoctone, originarie, per colpa dell'invasione degli ogm, un domani dovremmo chiedere il permesso alla Fondazione Rockefeller....
Per le persone che credono ancora nei politicanti, invece, facciano sentire la loro voce con i rappresentati di partito. Con il Trattato di Lisbona abbiamo perduto la sovranità monetaria, giuridica, economica e politica il tutto nelle mani dell’oligarchia bancaria internazionale: cerchiamo almeno di impedire la perdita di quella alimentare…
Nei piccoli supermercati o dal negoziante di fiducia, chiediamo e pretendiamo solo alimenti biologici o biodinamici; evitiamo di fare acquisti nei grossi centri commerciali, tutti a capitale straniero.

La scelta vegetariana biologica è per esempio, il primo passo, o come diceva il grande Leone Tolstoi: “il primo gradino di un progresso spirituale“.
Progresso spirituale, ma anche etico e morale, nei confronti della Natura e degli animali, importante e attualmente impellente.

[1]Sito ufficiale di Futuragra www.futuragra.it/index.php
[2]“Futuragra: McItaly operazione ogm free?” www.futuragra.it/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=145&Itemid=115
[3]“Gli ogm? Il colpo di grazia per la nostra agricoltura”, d.ssa Marina Mariani www.ariannaeditrice.it/articolo.php?id_articolo=30446
[4]“La Terza guerra alla salute e al clima”, Valdo Vaccaio, www.disinformazione.it/terza_guerra_alla_salute.htm
[5]Idem